Retired • Retired after 2020 season • PF/C • 8 years of NBA experience
Representative Teams
Stats
| Year | League | Team | G | MPG | PTS/G | FG | FGA | FG% | 3P | 3PA | 3P% | FT | FTA | FT% | ORB | DRB | TRB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | NBA | Philadelphia 76ers | 57 | 8.5 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 45.4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | – | 0.8 | 1.2 | 60.6% | 1.0 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.5 |
| 2006-07 | NBA | Philadelphia 76ers | 13 | 13.8 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 47.9% | 0.0 | 0.0 | – | 0.9 | 1.7 | 54.5% | 1.5 | 2.7 | 4.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.8 |
| 2007-08 | NBA | Philadelphia 76ers | 9 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 28.6% | 0.0 | 0.0 | – | 0.0 | 0.0 | – | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| 2008-09 | NBA | Portland Trail Blazers | 10 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 61.5% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 100.0% | 0.1 | 0.4 | 25.0% | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 2009-10 | NBA | Portland Trail Blazers | 3 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 33.3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | – | 0.7 | 0.7 | 100.0% | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 2009-10 | NBA | Miami Heat | 3 | 15.7 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 5.0 | 33.3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | – | 0.0 | 0.0 | – | 2.3 | 2.0 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 3.0 |
| 2009-10 | NBA | Total (NBA) | 6 | 8.8 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 33.3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | – | 0.3 | 0.3 | 100.0% | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| 2011-12 | China | Dongguan | 37 | 33.6 | 24.7 | 9.2 | 19.6 | 47.0% | 1.6 | 4.1 | 38.2% | 4.7 | 6.1 | 78.1% | 3.7 | 8.3 | 11.9 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 3.8 |
| 2012-13 | China | Foshan | 28 | 36.9 | 32.0 | 11.5 | 23.4 | 49.4% | 1.5 | 4.5 | 34.4% | 7.4 | 11.1 | 66.6% | 5.3 | 9.2 | 14.5 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 4.0 |
| 2012-13 | NBA | Boston Celtics | 16 | 12.4 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 58.3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | – | 0.7 | 1.7 | 40.7% | 1.8 | 2.6 | 4.4 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 2.4 |
| 2013-14 | China | Foshan | 6 | 32.4 | 22.3 | 7.2 | 17.2 | 41.7% | 0.3 | 1.8 | 18.2% | 7.7 | 10.5 | 73.0% | 5.3 | 7.0 | 12.3 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 2.8 |
| 2013-14 | NBA | Phoenix Suns | 14 | 6.8 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 50.0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | – | 0.4 | 0.8 | 54.5% | 0.5 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.1 |
| 2014-15 | NBA | Phoenix Suns | 16 | 6.3 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 24.0% | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 0.3 | 0.6 | 50.0% | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 |
| 2014-15 | NBA | Boston Celtics | 5 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 30.0% | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0% | 0.2 | 0.4 | 50.0% | 0.8 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| 2014-15 | NBA | Total (NBA) | 21 | 6.0 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 25.7% | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0% | 0.3 | 0.6 | 50.0% | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 |
| 2015-16 | China | Liaoning | 50 | 29.1 | 21.9 | 8.4 | 17.4 | 48.1% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 36.1% | 3.8 | 5.5 | 69.6% | 4.4 | 6.4 | 10.7 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 3.3 |
| 2016-17 | China | Liaoning | 45 | 27.3 | 18.4 | 7.0 | 15.8 | 44.2% | 1.4 | 4.0 | 34.6% | 3.1 | 4.7 | 65.1% | 3.9 | 5.9 | 9.8 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 2.9 |
| 2017-18 | China | Beikong Fly Dragons | 37 | 35.5 | 28.7 | 9.9 | 20.7 | 48.0% | 2.6 | 6.8 | 38.3% | 6.2 | 9.4 | 65.7% | 3.6 | 9.5 | 13.2 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 3.7 |
| 2018-19 | China | Beikong Fly Dragons | 15 | 28.3 | 22.8 | 7.9 | 17.5 | 45.0% | 2.2 | 5.6 | 39.3% | 4.7 | 8.0 | 59.2% | 2.1 | 6.7 | 8.8 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 3.1 |
Video
Articles
Older articles (3)
Anybody Wanna See Second Prize? Second Prize Is A Set Of Steak Knives.....
Why Randolph and Hasbrouck have been brought back, and with such a large amount of guaranteed money, is not clear. Both were on the team for the end of last season, yet Hasbrouck didn't play a minute with the team, and Randolph played only 3 games. Both are decent players; Randolph in particular is a good energy with a mid-range jumpshot who sticks around in the NBA for a reason. Yet neither is going to make the team, and so the money Miami gave them just seems excessive. Them being here for a combined five weeks for a combined cost of half a million dollars is essentially the basketball equivalent of making it rain. Slightly overzealous spending by some rather generous and highly satisfied executives, maybe. But good luck to them.
