Players > Retired > Andrew Bogut
Andrew Bogut
C - 7'0, 260lbs - 39 years old - 14 years of NBA experience
Retired - Retired after 2020 season
  • Birthdate: 11/28/1984
  • Drafted (NBA): 1st pick, 2005
  • Pre-draft team: Utah
  • Country: Australia
  • Hand: Right
  • Agent: -
2005 NBA DraftNBADrafted 1st overall by Milwaukee.
1st July, 2005NBASigned four year, $20,292,307 rookie scale contract with Milwaukee. Included team options for 2007/08 and 2008/09.
29th June, 2006NBAMilwaukee exercised 2007/08 team option.
21st June, 2007NBAMilwaukee exercised 2008/09 team option.
11th July, 2008NBASigned a five year, $60 million extension with Milwaukee.
14th March, 2012NBATraded by Milwaukee, along with Stephen Jackson, to Golden State in exchange for Monta Ellis, Ekpe Udoh and Kwame Brown.
25th October, 2013NBASigned a three year, $36 million extension with Golden State.
7th July, 2016NBATraded by Golden State, along with a future second round pick (Mavericks's option as to whether it is 2019 or 2020), to Dallas in exchange for a protected 2019 second round pick.
23rd February, 2017NBATraded by Dallas, along with Justin Anderson and a protected 2017 first round pick (converted to 2017 and 2020 second round picks; #36, 2017, Jawun Evans), to Philadelphia in exchange for Nerlens Noel.
27th February, 2017NBAWaived by Philadelphia.
2nd March, 2017NBASigned a guaranteed minimum salary contract for the remainder of the season with Cleveland.
13th March, 2017NBAWaived by Cleveland.
19th September, 2017NBASigned a partially guaranteed one year minimum salary contract with L.A. Lakers.
6th January, 2018NBAWaived by L.A. Lakers.
23rd April, 2018AustraliaSigned a two year contract with Sydney Kings.
6th March, 2018NBASigned a guaranteed minimum salary contract for the remainder of the season with Golden State (to rejoin Sydney Kings after its completion).
Career Moves
2001 - 2003Australian Institude of Sport (Australia, ABA)
2003 - 2005Utah (NCAA)
June 2005 - March 2012Milwaukee Bucks (NBA)
March 2012 - July 2016Golden State Warriors (NBA)
July 2016 - February 2017Dallas Mavericks (NBA)
February 2017Philadelphia 76ers (NBA)
March 2017Cleveland Cavaliers (NBA)
September 2017 - January 2018L.A. Lakers (NBA)
April 2018 - March 2019Sydney Kings (Australia)
March 2019 - presentGolden State Warriors (NBA)
Articles about Andrew Bogut

April 13, 2017

[...] Going into the playoffs, they still have these problems. Deron Williams has joined as a backup point, yet his handle and ball security seems to have disappeared along with his speed, and his name far outweighs his talent at this point. Similarly, up front, the injury to the foreseeably-available Andrew Bogut was unfortunate, but the fact that that even really matters speaks to the recklessness of entering a season with a wobbly roster hopeful that deadline-time buyouts will be enough to plug up the gaps. The holes in their roster, the over-reliance on Tristan Thompson for interior defense, on LeBron for passing and on Kevin Love for rebounding, were all avoidable. [...]

Read full article

October 31, 2013

In signing Andrew Bogut to a three-year extension, the Warriors have tried to tie down a quality player to a price representative of his skills and impact while mitigating the injury factor that now accompanies him everywhere. But the new contract also represents a risk that didn't need to be taken.

However unconnected and unfortunate most of them may be, Bogut nevertheless has a lengthy history of injures to various parts of his body. If someone thing has happened enough times in the past, it is fair to assume it is likely to happen again. It is certainly something to protect against.

It is being reported that Bogut's deal with pay $36 million over three years, an amount descending annually over the life of the contract, and that it can rise to $42 million if performance incentives are met. The concept of performance incentives is simple and correct: the more you play, and the better you play, the more we pay. The NBA does not allow for this to any great degree; performance bonuses are limited to being a maximum of 15 percent of regular salary, and if the reported figures are true, they align with this. This is not like baseball or football, where guarantees and levels of compensation can increase hugely via performance milestones. Nevertheless, the concept is somewhat accounted for in the NBA, and the Bogut deal features it. Indeed, it is dependent on it.

Aside from incentives, the other means a team has of protecting itself in this scenario is to make large portions of the base salary unguaranteed. This is what Cleveland has done with Andrew Bynum, whose $12,250,000 salary this season is only $6 million guaranteed until the league-wide guarantee date of January 10th, and whose $12,540,000 salary for next season is fully unguaranteed. It is unknown at the time whether any of Bogut's salary is unguaranteed, but it seems unlikely.

Golden State, then, have only managed to insure themselves a bit against further significant injury with the 15 percent bonus quota. In an absolute worst-case hypothetical scenario, whereby Bogut is again injured and never plays again, he's still getting his $36 million. This is the most Golden State could protect themselves.

Given that this is effectively scant little protection at all, it must lead us to question whether the extension was necessary. More pertinent than the amount of time Bogut is able to take the floor is the declining effectiveness he has when he's on it.

The thinking behind the extension is that Bogut, in his prime, was a defensive anchor the caliber of Dwight Howard and an effective offensive player through his passing, screening and thinly-veiled left-handedness. The healthy. productive Andrew Bogut was very, very good, arguably the second best center in the NBA at the time. If ever fully healthy, we like to imagine, he could be again.

Yet there is little evidence for this. Only hope.

It must be of grave concern that the phrase "in his prime" is perfectly acceptable to use about a 28-year-old. THIS should be Bogut's prime, and yet it isn't. Despite retaining much of the defensive effectiveness that made him as good as he did, Bogut's individual shot-making talent has declined considerably. And while shotmaking is only part of one half of the game, it significantly affects both player and team if the player cannot be relied upon to score or look for his own. This, plus the injuries, plus the age, affects the price. And the whole point of the extension was to dictate the price.

This is a market where centers earn maximum or near-maximum salary contracts with remarkable ease. For every Al Horford, Joakim Noah or Larry Sanders good value deal, there's one for DeAndre Jordan or JaVale McGee that sees the center position retain its eternal place at the top of the salary spectrum. In recent years, Marc Gasol, Brook Lopez and Roy Hibbert have all commanded maximum salary contracts, and only one of them had definitely earned it at the time of the deal. The other two were the cost of doing business, and business for good centers is expensive.

But it doesn't automatically follow from there that Bogut is in any of those price ranges. To be so, he'll have to be of that caliber as a player both now and in the future. Right now, and for the last two seasons, he has not been.

Why the rush?

The theory that Bogut would command a salary larger than this after a season of healthy and productive play, and thus needed to be secured early, is a pessimistic one not sufficiently considerate of his injuries and declined production. Bogut, in his prime, wasn't worth the max, and the new Bogut definitely isn't. Nor is he especially close to it. Barring a resurgence he still hasn't demonstrated is possible, there is nothing to pay $12 million for.

The threat of Golden State being outbid for his services is further nullified given that most teams already have high-priced options or young players destined to be once their rookie scale deals run out at the position, and thus would not need him. Extensions are means of protecting both player and team from the volatility of the free market, but the Warriors seemed to have little to fear. Even without the incentives, what has Bogut done to command a guaranteed $12 million per season?

The Warriors have given security to a player who has given them scant little of it. It's no one's fault this is how it's been; things just work out that way. And maybe this is finally the time for his luck to chance. We surely all hope so. But it was not the percentage play. It was unnecessary. They had ample opportunity to let him prove himself first.

This could all have been done in April. The only deadline on a non-rookie scale extension is the final day of the original contract. Why could this not have waited until later, when Bogut's ability and durability going forward are better established? Is the risk of him signing elsewhere, despite Golden State having both full Bird rights and the lure of being a good team in a familiar place, so sufficient to merit this? How do we know that Bogut is won't be a 66 game, 27 minute, seven-point, eight-rebound guy from here on out? Is that worth even the base $36 million? For all we know, the former Andrew Bogut is gone for good. This would be a shame and is in no way certain, but it could happen.

Golden State wanted to buy low on a quality, reliable veteran with an incredibly valuable skill set. But for that to be the case, everything needs to change.

Read full article

March 14, 2012

When the Warriors signed Kwame Brown to a one year, $6.75 million deal this offseason, we laughed for a bit, and then looked at the logic for why they did it.

This logic was threefold. Firstly, it helped the Warriors shore up their and the league’s weakest position with a capable veteran, vital for a team like the Wariors that genuinely thinks it can (and should) make the playoffs, and gave the team its first starting center-who-is-actually-a-center-not-Anthony-Tolliver since Andris Biedrins went into the tank. Secondly, the one year nature of the deal kept alive cap space aspirations for next summer, which, in light of the unsuccesful cap space aspirations this summer, was going to give Golden State yet another chance at that elusive center. And thirdly, they could use his expiring contract to trade for Dwight Howard! Or someone like that.

The latter actually happened. There’ll be no cap space now, nor any more Dwight pipe dreams; apparently, Andrew Bogut will be the answer to the profound, endless, big man problems.

There’s a case to be made for that. When healthy, he is the answer. When healthy, Bogut is the second-best defensive big in the game, a shot-blocking, charge-taking, rebounding, rotating, always-in-the-right-placing anchor in the middle who, notwithstanding lacking any sort of shot from outside the paint, helps on the offensive end too with passing vision and strong left-handed finishing. When healthy, he’s also one of the better offensive centers, and all this for a highly competitive $12 million (pre-trade kicker) per season. When healthy.

But Bogut isn’t healthy. Not now, not for any of the last four full seasons, and not ever truly healthy again.

Because of this, the Warriors take an unashamedly massive gamble. They have invested heavily in the idea that a healthy David Lee/Andrew Bogut frontcourt is a very, very good frontcourt around which to build a playoff caliber team. And they’re right. It would be. But “would” is a highly speculative word. Much to all of our loss, Bogut has not been the player he was. While most of it has been sheer bad luck, that bad luck has compounded to create a wounded body that will never be quite right ever again, ever more susceptible to further injury. And it just keeps on coming. Andrew Bogut gets hurt a lot. Some guys just do.

[...] Rather that just signing a center this summer, as the Kwame contract allowed for, the Warriors traded their best player for one. In the process, they lost the cap space, their most significant means available of adding further talent, and threw in one of their better young pieces for the hell of it. Whatever anyone may think of Ellis and Udoh in isolation, it is difficult to see how what has transpired over the past four seasons has culminated in Andrew Bogut carrying that much value. Particularly when the net negative that is Stephen Jackson is tacked on as well. Golden State is paying based on an absolute best-case scenario. Even then, they might be overpaying.

[...] The deal also has upside for both teams. With plenty of rest and rehab, the Warriors figure to start next season with a Curry, Lee and Bogut trio, with Brandon Rush and Klay Thompson on the wings, another lottery pick to come, and a manageable cap situation. If Bogut’s luck does ever start to run better, the Warriors just found a defensive anchor, the toughest thing there is to find in this league. Milwaukee meanwhile saves some money (both next season on Jackson, and in 2013-14, when they will likely have great cap space), removes a problem, and gains a 20+ppg scorer. They need about 56 follow-up moves, but in isolation, this one is solid. They returned talent for players not really helping them any more, and made themselves favorites for the eighth seed in the East.

Apparently, though, that’s the sum total of the plan. Low playoff seeds. The two teams were both floundering, both out of the playoffs, both not going anywhere … so they swapped their best players. Now, they’re still not going anywhere.

Read full article